© 2008, Columbia Laboratories, Inc. All rights reserved.

 

Please note that the product information provided on this website is intended only for residents of the United States.

Resources

 

Professional and Patient Websites

 

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

American Society for Reproductive Medicine

International Council on Infertility Information Dissemination

Internet Health Resources

MedHelp Fertility Forum

Resolve: The National Infertility Association

Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology

 

These links are provided for information only. The opinions expressed therein do not necessarily reflect those of Columbia Laboratories, Inc.

 

Bibliography of Crinone 8% Studies

 

Alper MM, Penzias AS. Crinone® offers excellent implantation rates in patients undergoing IVF. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Human Reproduction & Embryology; June 2000; Bologna, Italy. Abstract P-059.

 

Anlar S, Capan Y, Hincal AA. Physico-chemical and bioadhesive properties of polyacrylic acid polymers. Pharmazie. 1993;48:285–287.

 

Anserini P, Costa M, Remorgida V, Sarli R, Guglielminetti E, Ragni N. Luteal phase support in assisted reproductive cycles using either vaginal (Crinone 8) or intramuscular (Prontogest) progesterone: results of a prospective, randomized study [in Italian]. Minerva Ginecol. 2001;53:297–301.

 

Bulletti C, de Ziegler D, Flamigni C, et al. Targeted drug delivery in gynaecology: the first uterine pass effect. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1073–1079.

 

Chantilis SJ, Zeitoun KM, Patel SI, et al. Use of Crinone vaginal progesterone gel for luteal support in in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:823–829.

 

Cicinelli E, de Ziegler D, Bulletti C, Matteo MG, Schonauer LM, Galantino P. Direct transport of progesterone from vagina to uterus. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:403–406.

 

Coutifaris C, Patrizio P, Schafer D, Bunso S, Bucci J, Barnhart K. Is the use of Crinone for support of the luteal phase detrimental to pregnancy outcome after transfer of non-cryopreserved embryos in good prognosis patients? A preliminary report. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(suppl 1):S205. Abstract P-350.

 

Doody K, Shamma N, Paulson R, Bayer S, Blake E, Yankov V. Endometrin® for luteal phase support in a randomized, controlled, open-label, prospective IVF clinical trial using a combination of Menopur® and Bravelle®. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(Suppl 2):S24. Abstract P-34.

 

Elkind-Hirsch KE, Phillips K, Bello SM, McNichol M, de Ziegler D. Sequential hormonal supplementation with vaginal estradiol and progesterone gel corrects the effect of clomiphene on the endometrium in oligo-ovulatory women. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:295–298.

 

Elkind-Hirsch KE, Darensbourg C, Creasy G, Gipe D. Conception rates in clomiphene citrate cycles with and without hormone supplementation: a pilot study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005;21:1035–1040.

 

Gibbons WE, Toner JP, Hamacher P, Kolm P. Experience with a novel vaginal progesterone preparation in a donor oocyte program. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:96–101.

 

Kleinstein J. Efficacy and tolerability of vaginal progesterone capsules (Utrogest™ 200) compared with progesterone gel (Crinone™ 8%) for luteal phase support during assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1641–1649.

 

Levine H. Luteal support from the vaginal progesterone (P) gel Crinone 8%: preliminary results of multicenter trial show higher pregnancy rates than historical controls. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2000;7(suppl):203A. Abstract 571.

 

Ludwig M, Schwartz P, Babahan B, et al. Luteal phase support using either Crinone® 8% or Utrogest®: results of a prospective, randomized study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;103:48–52.

 

Mahaguna V, McDermott JM, Zhang F, Ochoa F. Investigation of product quality between extemporaneously compounded progesterone vaginal suppositories and an approved progesterone vaginal gel. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2004;30;1069–1078.

 

Park H, Robinson JR. Physico-chemical properties of water insoluble polymers important to mucin/epithelial adhesion. J Control Release. 1985;2:47–57.

 

Saucedo LLE, Galache VP, Hernández AS, Santos HR, Arenas ML, Patrizio P. Randomized trial of three different forms of progesterone supplementation in ART: preliminary results. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(suppl 1):S150. Abstract P-175.

 

Saucedo LLE, Batiza V, Arenas L, et al. Progesterone for luteal support: randomized, prospective trial comparing vaginal and i.m. administration. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Human Reproduction & Embryology; July 2003; Madrid, Spain. Abstract P-383.

 

Schoolcraft WB, Hesla JS, Gee MJ. Experience with progesterone gel for luteal support in a highly successful IVF programme. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1284–1288.

 

Simunic V, Tomic V, Tomic J, Nizic D. Comparative study of the efficacy and tolerability of two vaginal progesterone formulations, Crinone 8% gel and Utrogestan capsules, used for luteal support. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:83–87.

 

Warren MP, Biller BMK, Shangold MM. A new clinical option for hormone replacement therapy in women with secondary amenorrhea: effects of cyclic administration of progesterone from the sustained-release vaginal gel Crinone (4% and 8%) on endometrial morphologic features and withdrawal bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:42–48.

 

Williams SC, Donahue J, Muasher SJ. Vaginal progesterone therapy during programmed cycles for frozen embryo transfer: an analysis of serum progesterone levels and pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(suppl 1):S209. Abstract P-363.

 

Yanushpolsky E, Hurwitz S, Greenberg L, Racowsky C, Hornstein MD. Comparison of Crinone 8% intravaginal gel and intramuscular progesterone supplementation for in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer in women under age 40: interim analysis of a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:485–487.